BACKGROUND: Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have been used to prevent cardiogenic embolism in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). No evidence has been established for the follow-up renal function evaluation intervals. We hypothesized that a proposed follow-up interval of renal function can be estimated by patient's baseline characteristics including creatinine clearance (CCr). METHODS: We conducted a single-center retrospective study at Kindai University Hospital from May 2011 to December 2017. Patients were screened and they were enrolled if baseline CCr of ≥50 mL/min. To provide a periodical synchronization for measurements of CCr in all patients, these were evaluated at four different time points (approximately at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months). Primary endpoint was defined as a CCr value of <50 mL/min during the follow-up period. We analyzed associations between the cumulative risk for renal endpoint and baseline characteristics by the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. RESULTS: Renal endpoint was associated with age (95% CI: 0.07 to 0.21, p<0.01), body weight (95% CI: -0.09 to -0.01, p<0.01), CCr (95% CI: -0.18 to -0.07, p<0.01), and CHA2DS2-VASc score (95% CI: 0.14 to 0.63, p<0.01). Combining baseline CCr of <60 mL/min and other risk factors, acceptable intervals for 5% risk levels were 78 days (age ≥75 years old), 100 days (CHA2DS2-VASc score of> 4 points), and 90 days (body weight <60kg), respectively. Under conditions of baseline CCr of <60 mL/min, age ≥75 years old, CHA2DS2-VASc score of> 4 points, or body weight <60 kg, an increased risk of renal endpoints is 4.85, 3.29, 1.24, 2.44 fold, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: We propose a risk-stratified follow-up interval for renal evaluation in patients with AF and DOACs therapy according to a combination of baseline CCr and other risk factors.

Background: Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is currently the gold standard technique for diagnosing left atrial appendage (LAA) thrombi. Cardiac computed tomography (CT) has been expected to become an alternative method to TEE; however, a reliable quantitative evaluation method has not been established. Methods and results: We enrolled 177 patients with persistent atrial fibrillation who underwent both cardiac CT and TEE before catheter ablation. The patients were classified into two groups according to the TEE results: the thrombus group (13 patients) and non-thrombus group (164 patients). The Hounsfield unit (HU) density at the proximal LAA (LAAp) and distal LAA (LAAd) was measured on cardiac CT images. The LAAd/LAAp HU ratio and standard deviation of HU density (HU-SD) at the LAAd were evaluated. We created an algorithm by decision tree analysis to predict LAA thrombus formation using the HU ratio and HU-SD. Definite absence of LAA thrombus (Category-I) was diagnosed for 139 patients by combining the first and second branching of the decision tree (Category-Ia: HU ratio of ≥0.26, Category-Ib: HU ratio of <0.26, HD-SD of ≥26.94). Definite presence of LAA thrombus (Category-Ⅱ) was diagnosed for 3 patients using the third branching of the decision tree (Category-Ⅱ: HU ratio of <0.26 and HU-SD of <13.85). Highly possibility of LAA thrombus (Category-III), but not definite, was diagnosed for the remaining 35 patients; therefore, these patients required diagnostic TEE. The diagnostic accuracy of this algorithm was 0.95. Conclusion: We have proposed a reliable algorithm to diagnose LAA thrombus formation using the HU ratio and HU-SD.

BACKGROUND: Implantable cardioverter-defibrillator and cardiac resynchronization therapy using a defibrillator (ICD/CRT-D) are established means of reducing mortality due to ventricular arrhythmia. Although atrial fibrillation/flutter (AF) is the most common cardiac arrhythmia in patients with heart disease, the impact of AF on the prognosis of patients with ICD/CRT-D remains controversial. METHODS AND RESULTS: We analyzed data from the Nippon Storm Study, a prospective observational study of 1570 patients that was conducted at 48 Japanese ICD centers. We allocated 1549 participants to AF and non-AF groups, compared their clinical data at the time of enrollment, and monitored the incidences of mortality, hospitalization, and appropriate and inappropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy during a median 28 months. When the AF (n = 257, 16.6%) and non-AF-(n = 1292, 83.4%) groups were compared, the AF group was older (67.7 vs. 61.4 years; p<0.0001), and had lower left ventricular ejection fraction (38.0 ± 17.0% vs. 43.5 ± 18.9%; p<0.0001). During follow up, mortality was significantly higher in the AF than the non-AF group (p<0.0001). In multivariate analysis, AF was significantly associated with all-cause mortality [p = 0.013; hazard ratio (HR)=1.62]. Inappropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy occurred in 40/257 patients (15.6%) and AF was associated with a higher prevalence of inappropriate ICD/CRT-D therapy (p<0.0001; HR=2.25). CONCLUSION: The presence of AF at ICD/CRT-D implantation carries subsequent independent risks of 1.62-fold for death and 2.25-fold for inappropriate therapy.

AIMS: The number of patients with both chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and heart failure (HF) is increasing in Asia, and these conditions often coexist. We previously revealed a tendency of beta-blocker underuse among patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) and COPD in Asian countries other than Japan. Here, we evaluated the impact of cardio-selective beta-blocker use on the long-term outcomes of patients with HF and COPD. METHODS AND RESULTS: Among the 5232 patients with HFrEF (left ventricular ejection fraction of <40%) prospectively enrolled from 11 Asian regions in the ASIAN-HF registry, 412 (7.9%) had a history of COPD. We compared the clinical characteristics and long-term outcomes of the patients with HF and COPD according to the use and type of beta-blockers used: cardio-selective beta-blockers (n = 149) vs. non-cardio-selective beta-blockers (n = 124) vs. no beta-blockers (n = 139). The heart rate was higher, and the outcome was poorer in the no beta-blocker group than in the beta-blocker groups. The 2 year all-cause mortality was significantly lower in the non-cardio-selective beta-blocker group than in the no beta-blocker group. Further, the cardiovascular mortality significantly decreased in the non-cardio-selective beta-blocker group before (hazard ratio: 0.36; 95% confidence interval: 0.18-0.73; P = 0.004) and after adjustments (hazard ratio: 0.37; 95% confidence interval: 0.19-0.73; P = 0.005), but not in the cardio-selective beta-blocker group. CONCLUSIONS: Beta-blockers reduced the all-cause mortality of patients with HFrEF and COPD after adjusting for age and heart rate, although the possibility of selection bias could not be completely excluded due to multinational prospective registry.

BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of data comparing the long-term outcomes after inferior vena cava (IVC) filters placement for patients with acute venous thromboembolism (VTE) between those with and without active cancer. METHODS: In the COMMAND VTE Registry, we evaluated the effects of IVC filter use on the long-term clinical outcomes stratified by the presence and absence of active cancer. RESULTS: Among 2,626 patients with acute symptomatic VTE, there were 604 patients with active cancer, and 2022 patients without active cancer. IVC filters were placed and not retrieved in 455 patients (17%) in the entire cohort, in 150 patients (24.8%) in the active cancer stratum, and in 305 patients (15.1%) in the non-cancer stratum. In the entire cohort, non-retrieved IVC filter placement was not associated with a lower adjusted risk for PE recurrence (HR 0.59, 95% CI 0.30-1.15, P = 0.122), but with an increased adjusted risk for DVT recurrence (HR 2.27, 95% CI 1.43-3.60, P<0.001). In the non-cancer stratum, the non-retrieved IVC filter placement was associated with a decreased risk for PE (HR 0.29, 95% CI 0.09-0.93, P = 0.037), but not with an increased risk for DVT (HR 1.73, 95% CI 0.89-3.38, P = 0.108), while in the active cancer stratum, it was associated with an increased risk for DVT (HR 2.47, 95% CI 1.24-4.91, P = 0.010), but not with a decreased risk for PE (HR 0.82, 95% CI 0.34--1.96, P = 0.650). CONCLUSIONS: There were some differences in the risk-benefit balance between VTE patients with and without active cancer.

BACKGROUND: A common complication associated with implantable cardiac electrical device implantation compromises skin lesions caused by overstretching just above a buried device that is relatively large in size. Apart from affecting the cosmetic appearance in some patients, a compromised blood supply to the skin may also lead to ischemic necrosis, which is an important complication. We describe a novel procedure for the implantation of implantable cardiac electrical devices generators under the pectoralis major muscle to avoid such skin-related complications. METHODS: Twenty-one patients were referred to plastic surgeon for surgical support for the secondary replacement of implantable cardiac electrical devices. In all cases, the leads and devices had been implanted under the skin. We decided to perform device implantation under the pectoralis major muscle, which was highly recommended in all these patients. RESULTS: In Japan, leanness is determined on the basis of body mass index less than 18.5, and 11 patients out of 21 (52%) were considered to be lean. The surgeon's participation in the procedure for implantable cardiac electrical device implantation did not exceed 5 minutes in total. CONCLUSIONS: We consider that the novel method of sub-pectoralis major muscle device implantation described here minimizes the risk of the skin breakdown and improves the patient's quality of life.

医局論文番号526

医局論文番号524

医局登録番号 512

第44巻（SUPPL.3）号69-73頁

医局登録番号 473

医局登録番号 478