The aim of this study is to describe the communication-style in the differentsituations (Testing situation and Chatting situation) by using the case of Mr.S who wasdiagnosed the Asperger Syndrome. It is said that the Asperger Syndrome children has a little social skill and the conversational problems. For example, even though the Asperger Syndrome children talks with someone, he seems to talk with nobody. In the conversation, he just keep talking what he wants and he does not seem to listen to someone's talking. He also receives the meaning what someone says without the real meaning behind. Those ways of conversation are said the characteristics of the Asperger Syndrome children. Are not the actions of human being depend on the situations that he is in? Does not he select his suitable actions and words in the different situations?In this study, I explore the communication-style of the Asperger Syndrome children by adopting the method of the Video-based ethnography and analyzed the communication-style between he and me. The result shows us to the different communication-style that depended on the different-situations such as "the testing situation and the chatting situation. In the testing situation,he tended to behave and speak according to the Asperger Syndrome characters that they are said generally. On the other hand, he behaved and spoke in the ways that the ordinal people do like us when we were just chatting.According to this result, his communication-style depends on the different situations. Therefore, we cannot regard someone to be the Asperger Syndrome children only by referring to the testing but only the daily life that he lives.

The purpose of this study is to criticize a medical and a psychological supports of AD/HD children and to reconsider the alternative way of supporting with the perspective of "Clinical Sociology". I do not think, however, "Clinical Sociology" is defined clearly yet because Clinical Sociologist do not have the specific way to enter the problematic matters or situations now. Therefore, nowadays, if somebody has some problem, he will be usually supported with the medical or the psychological theories or therapists. In this point, I doubt that those supports make effort to solve their problems or not. The reasons why I doubt those supports are efficient or not are that they usually solve the problem to divine suffering people from the context that they live. I believe the problems that AD/HD children have are not clearly occurred by the biological disorders but the quality of the interactions in the society.The therapists use "Social Skill Training" for training the attitudes of AD/HD children to change the better way. This training is done in the classroom or the other small spaces where children do not actually live. For example, an AD/HD child is determined to have a problem with social skill like a greeting, he forced to learn how to greet nicely toward the other people in the classroom but in the real context. How does he learn this? I think that he just learns the words he is expected in the society but he does not understand the meaning of the importance of the greeting. Although the medical or the psychological theories or the therapists focus on the biological aspect and try to change AD/HD children themselves, the practice of Clinical Sociology has the possibility of understanding the meaning of the problem and can look for the real supports of AD/HD.

個人の生活史は単なる編年的記録ではない。生活史は構成的であり、現在の視点から選択的に出来事が配列される。本研究は生活史をナラティヴの観点から基礎づけ、心理社会的課題の理解と解決に寄与する方法として提示することが目的である。対人援助場面において聴取された生活史の生成過程について検討を行った。その結果、生活史の方法論的独自性として、以下の3点が抽出された。 (1)生活史が内包する時間の重層性、(2)記憶・想起の集合性と継承性、(3)出来事の個人の生における意味。生活史は個人の体験の世界を一貫して表現する方法であり、聞き手との共同構成のプロセスによって、当事者の自己形成と回復を支えることが示された。